On 29 November last year, Party Secretary Xi
Jinping evoked The China Dream during a visit to "The Road
Toward Renewal" exhibition in Beijing.. The phrase went viral on
China’s Twitter-style weibo and drew
a spate of emotional patriotic outpouring from overseas Chinese.
Since
then, commentators have been trying to interpret Xi’s vision, ranging from a
mundane call for solving China’s problems, to a sublime renaissance comparable
to ancient glories of the Middle Kingdom or Europe’s Age of Enlightenment. Click here In
any case, Xi was speaking of a “China Dream” for the nation collectively, not a “Chinese
Dream” in the sense of good life of the “American Dream”.
In face
of a legitimacy crisis, the yearnings for epochal change have been in the air
amongst the top leadership. Since Xi took office as Party Secretary, he has
launched a high-profile battle against official corruption and extravagance,
calling for closer bond between the Party and the people, and upholding the
rule of law and ideals enshrined in China’s Constitution. Click here
Some cold water was poured on Xi’s
reformist rhetoric by an article in the New York Times. Xi’s fight against
corruption and inequalities is pitted against opposition from vested interests.
His demand for constitutional checks is contrasted with his warning about the collapse
of the former USSR. His call for political liberalization is cited with his
approbation of Mao’s revolutionary socialism. Reading the article, one can be
forgiven for thinking that Xi's reformist stance resembles "a riddle,
wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma."
The confusion and myth are largely
a product of binary thinking - either giving up single party leadership or
sclerosis, either Western democracy or risk of a "French Revolution",
either forward to the future or retreat to Maoism.
In fact, the apparent contradictions are signs of a continuing quest for China’s
unique model of democracy. There is a conviction that there is no
one-size-fits-all formula, least of all a quick-fix that mandated glasnost and perestroika within 500 days which precipitated the collapse of the
former USSR.
Indeed, in enlightened Party intellectual debate, the original Paris Commune is
considered a form of local democracy ("we the people") and Mao's
revolutionary "mass line" as embracing the will of the “grassroots” (or
the 99%) against social injustice.
Not many in China believe that the country's future lies in copying Western
multi-party “confrontational” democracy, with all its recent fault-lines. But
how to make the Party truly represent and accountable to the people within a one-party
state continues to test the ingenuity of the leadership.
For starters, however, China is likely to change the household registration (hukou) system (which marginalizes
migrant workers) as well as to promote civil society to monitor local governance.
These reforms and others are proposed in a recent 468-page World Bank report
jointly undertaken with the Development Research Centre of the State Council. Click here
Another pointer to feasible change was a succinct, down-to-earth, 10-year roadmap for China’s social and political development provided by Professor Yu
Jianrong of the Chinese Academy of Social Science. This includes a more centralized
(and less locally biased) judiciary, abolition of certain authoritarian organs
such as “labour educated camps”, and more governance transparency, including declaration
of officials’ private assets. Indeed, some of these measures are brewing, if
not already being experimented with.
However, as China vows to realize a middle-income society by 2030, it is timely
to revitalize the Party by invoking a grand renewal reminiscent of what
captivated the entire people at the founding of the People’s Republic. In a thought-provoking book “The Transformation of Chinese Socialism”,
Ms Lin Jun evokes the vision of “xiaokang
(middle-income) socialism” with empowered local citizenry. Amongst other
thoughts, she explains how “community,
security, integrity, and democracy” can be intertwined to empower local
citizenry, including the non-profit and voluntary sectors, in creating a
harmonious and “caring economy”. Her thoughts resonate
with a popular nostalgia for ideals of the Communist Revolution “where its
government was clean, its army was the model of serving the people, its working
men and women were dignified, and its life was meaningful without
commodification and consumerism.”
Moreover, in the age of scarcity
and environmental strains, it is possible to envision an epochal transition
from an “industrial” to an “ecological civilization”, in the words of Pan Yue,
China’s Vice Minister of Environmental Protection Click here, where minimalism is preferred over surfeit, and
less can be more.
Indeed, local citizenry has recently
been allowed to grow and even succeed in reversing major municipal projects on
environmental grounds. Citizenry empowerment in the workplace is also quietly
promoted as in the case of Foxconn, Apple’s Taiwanese manufacturer. The company
is now allowed to bring in US-based Fair Labour Association to train its 1.2
million workers in China in voting for representatives on 18,000 union committees.
It has often been said that with the
One Child Policy, China will get old before getting rich, as the pool of low-wage
workers is being exhausted. However, thanks to an annual
output of seven million university graduates, China will have 195 million of
them by 2020, more than the entire U.S workforce. In a survey in May 2012, KPMG, an audit, tax and
advisory firm, expects that over the next four years China will rival with the
United States in innovative technologies, particularly in cloud computing and
mobile telephony. Likewise, Clyde Prestowitz, president of the Economic
Strategy Institute, anticipates the rise of a “Silicon China” Click here. According to the World Intellectual Property Organization,
China tops the world in 2011 in patent applications, the first time in a
century for a developing country Click here. By all accounts, therefore, China should
be on track to overcoming the Middle Income Trap in transit to a
higher-income country.
This prognosis
is supported by a presentation of Professor Angang Hu of Tsinghua University.
He finds that driven by total factor productivity growth, innovation and human
capital accumulation, by 2020 China will, by whatever measurements, surpass the
United States as the largest economy, growing to 2.2 to 2.5 times the U.S. GDP
by 2030. By that time, China is slated to have the largest consumer market, the
largest urbanization, and the largest infrastructural system, coupled with the
largest pool of innovative human capital, a green country, and a more equal and
equitable society.
Nevertheless,
there remain many institutional bottlenecks and other challenges like resource
scarcity, demography and vested interests that can derail Professor Hu’s optimistic
trajectory. What is even more crucial, however, is whether China could craft a
path-breaking new “social contract” that can harness a democratically organised
citizenry to aid, monitor, participate in and hold accountable a clean and
effective state that delivers the greatest public goods for the greatest
proportion of the people.
Notwithstanding
the odds, a visionary China Dream never fails to inspire and rally dedicated or
ambitious aspirants. According to the People’s Daily, a 27-year old double-major
from Yale University is giving up a lucrative career overseas to work as a
lowly-paid official in a remote village in Hunan Province. As a Chinese, he
vows to give his share to help fellow villagers to realize the dream for a
better life for themselves and their off-springs. Click here
The hearts
and minds of the whole nation are now being touched by Xi’s “China Dream”, and
the inspiring vision, imprecise though it is, does not look wholly
unattainable.
Alexi de
Tocquerville’s“The Ancien Regime and the Revolution” is a critique on how liberal and
egalitarian revolutionary ideals could become corrupted and forgotten
afterwards. The classic tome has been
reported to be doing the rounds amongst China’s top leaders and is now a best-seller
in China Click here. When asked by Richard Nixon, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai was
reported to have said that the implication of the French revolution was too
soon to tell. Perhaps he was right all along.
(An edited version of the above article is published in the Insight Column of the South China Moring Post of 9 March 2013)
Download SCMP Op-ed - Not So Illusive