A South China Morning Post exclusive of 22 April, 2019 gives an in-depth and fairly balanced view of both sides of the picture.
On the one hand, the Belt and Road Initiative meets a yearning need for infrastructural investment, particularly in the developing world and in struggling economies, leading to greater productivity, local job creation and productivity growth. It also meets China's own needs to make better use of its excess capacity, doubles down on China's advantage of global economic connectivity, and helps to realize the China Dream of greater global influence as a great power.
On the other hand, there are real and perceived risks of a "debt trap", environmental fallout, corruption and erosion of best practices. What is more, there are concerns that the Belt and Road is China's strategy to upend the Western liberal order at the expense of the United States and its allies.
One thing for sure is that the scale of China's initiative is mind-boggling. There seems no fixed boundaries where the initiative cannot hope to venture. While oft-quoted maps for the Belt and Road usually refer to Asia, East Africa, the Middle East and Eurasia, its extension has been reported in other parts of Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and even the Arctic.
Initially the Belt and Road Initiative aims to cover 152 countries worldwide at an estimated cost of US$4-8 trillion, many times America's postwar Marshall Plan for Europe in comparable money terms. However, the comparison is inappropriate in terms of global reach, development deliverables, connectivity and inclusivity.
According to the Report "The Belt and Road Initiative: Progress, Contributions and Prospects" released on 22 April, 2019 by the Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative, up to now, 173 deals have been signed with 125 countries and 29 international institutions, including 26 in Asia, 24 in Europe, 14 in the Middle East and 3 in Africa.
With 1,800 projects underway, click here, the initiative is nowhere near conclusion, particularly in Africa, where China's footprint is almost ubiquitous. It is thus likely to be a work in progress for many decades, if not stretching beyond mid-century.
For the initiative to be sustainable, China is beginning to learn from mistakes and deficiencies such the need for better corporate governance as well as partnership with a wider range of stakeholders, not least advanced countries including Japan and Western Europe as well as with multilateral organizations like the World Bank and the United Nations Development Program.
What’s at the end of China’s New Silk Road? Cleary it is too early to tell.